Peptide Decoding
Tools/Status

What is
actually legal

Approval and regulatory status for every compound in the library, with the source and the date it was last checked.

Status here is for the United States.
Rules change. Every row says when it was last looked at.
FDA approved32
Clinical use13
Investigational25
Over the counter28
Research only127
The library

Most of what people take has no approval anywhere

All 225 compounds
115 of 225 compounds carry a full regulatory note. The rest show status only and are marked as not yet reviewed rather than left blank. That number goes up every month.
What the labels mean

Three words that get mixed up constantly

Approved

A regulator reviewed the evidence and cleared the drug for a specific use, in a specific form, at a specific dose. Approval for one use is not approval for another, and approval abroad is not approval here.

Compoundable

A pharmacy is permitted to prepare it. That permission rests on lists and reviews rather than on a full approval, and a compound can be legally prepared while never having been approved for anything.

Not banned

The weakest of the three, and the one most often reported as good news. A substance coming off a review list means the review stopped, and it says nothing about whether the thing works or is safe.

In April 2026 twelve peptides came off one of the FDA's review categories because the people who had nominated them withdrew the nominations. That was widely written up as a step toward approval. It was the review ending, and nothing was decided about any of them.

Common questions

Is BPC-157 legal?

Owning it is not the issue. Selling it as a supplement or a drug is, and pharmacies are not currently permitted to compound it. It has never been approved for any use in any country. Its listing status has moved more than once, so check its row for the current position and the date.

Does an advisory committee vote mean something got approved?

No. An advisory committee recommends. The recommendation is not binding, it usually concerns whether pharmacies may compound something rather than whether it may be sold as a drug, and a formal rulemaking process follows that takes months.

Why do so many rows say research only?

Because that is what the evidence supports. Most of the compounds here have no approval anywhere and are sold labelled for laboratory use. That label is a legal position rather than a description of how people are actually using them.

Is this legal advice?

No. It is a plain-language summary of published regulatory documents with links to them. Rules differ by country and by state, they change, and we are not lawyers.

A row is out of date. Can I tell you?

Please do. Use the report an error link in the footer. Corrections with a primary source attached get made the same week.