Peptide Decoding
Two peptide vials side by side on a dark surface
Step 02 / Compare

Compare peptides side by side

Type two or more compounds the way you'd type them into Google. Spelling doesn't have to be right.

2/4

Separate them with vs, a comma, or +. Up to 4 compounds.

Try

AOD-9604 and HGH Fragment 176-191 are each a fragment of the growth hormone molecule.

/compare/aod-9604-vs-hgh-fragment-176-191
ComparisonAOD-9604
AOD9604 · Anti-Obesity Drug 9604
HGH Fragment 176-191
HGH Frag · Frag 176-191
How it works
How it works

AOD-9604 is the tail end of the growth hormone molecule, the fragment linked to fat breakdown, with one amino acid added for stability. The idea was to keep one effect and discard the rest.

How it works

The fragment is the last section of the growth hormone molecule, residues 176 to 191, isolated because that region is associated with fat breakdown.

What it is
A growth-hormone fragment marketed for fat loss, with weak proof it works.
The fat-burning piece of growth hormone, aimed at stubborn fat.
Status
Research only
Research only
Typical dose
0.3 mg per day
single fixed dose
0.25–0.5 mg per day
How often
Daily
Daily
Stays active
About 3 minutes in animals
Not established
Dose comes from
Community practice
Community practice
Cycled?
Studied as daily dosing for up to 12 weeks Clinical trial protocol
Studied as daily dosing for up to 12 weeks Clinical trial protocol
What it does
Drug class
HGH fragment (176-191)
HGH fragment
Used for
People use it hoping to burn fat without the muscle or blood-sugar effects of full growth hormone. The human proof that it works is weak.
People use it to try to target stubborn fat. Real human evidence is thin.
Receptors hit
Numbers
Full dose line
0.3 mg per day
0.25 up to 0.5 mg per day (start low, increase slowly)
Why that cycle
The obesity trials gave it daily for up to 12 weeks with no cycling. Worth knowing that those trials did not show weight loss over placebo, so the schedule question is somewhat academic.
The same molecule as AOD-9604, given daily for up to 12 weeks in the obesity trials with no cycling and no benefit over placebo.
Weight / effect
Not measured in a trial
Not measured in a trial
Chain length
16 residues
15 residues
Common vial
5 mg
5 mg
Before you start
Route
Under the skin (subcutaneous)
Under the skin (subcutaneous)
Do not use if
No formal contraindications established
Pregnancy
Pregnancy
Banned in drug-tested sport

What separates them

Proof behind the dose. Every dose here comes from community practice. Not one is backed by a published human study, which is worth knowing before you read the numbers as if they were equivalent.

What doesn't differ: They are both taken the same way (under the skin), aimed at the same thing (fat loss) and on the same schedule (daily). Neither has a measured effect size from a published trial, so there is no number to rank them on.

Difference map
Each column keeps its compound color below. A shared gray row means the same answer; colored cells show where they split.
AOD-9604
HGH Fragment 176-191
PROOF
Community practice
Community practice

What people actually report

AOD-9604

  • Generally well tolerated, but there is little solid evidence it produces real fat loss in people.
Stop and get help if
  • Signs of an allergic reaction

HGH Fragment 176-191

  • Generally well tolerated, but weak proof it works.
  • Banned in drug-tested sport.
Stop and get help if
  • Signs of an allergic reaction

Side effects are what users and trials report most often, not a complete list. Anything sudden, spreading, or breathing-related is an emergency regardless of which compound caused it.

People also compare

This comparison does not cover cost, long-term safety, or how you personally will respond. Effect figures come from separate trials in different populations and are not always directly comparable to each other. Nothing here is medical advice or a recommendation to use any of these. Talk to a clinician about your own situation.

Commonly confused peptides

Long-form breakdowns of the pairs people confuse most, traced to primary sources.

Healing and recovery

Thymosin Alpha-1 vs LL-37

One is approved in 35 countries and its largest trial found nothing. The other has never been injected in a published study.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Cagrilintide vs Semaglutide

Both were tested in the same trial, in the same people, over the same 68 weeks. Semaglutide won on weight, and the combination beat both while coming in below their sum.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Retatrutide vs Tirzepatide

Retatrutide's 28.3 percent is being set against tirzepatide's 22.5 percent. Different trials, different lengths, and one of the numbers comes from a press release.

Read comparison ›
Sexual and hormonal

PT-141 vs Kisspeptin

Both are sold for sex. One works on desire and is FDA approved, the other works on hormones and stops working within two weeks.

Read comparison ›
Longevity

MOTS-c vs SS-31

One has an FDA approval and a failed Phase 3. The other has never been given to a person in a published study.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Tesamorelin vs CJC-1295

Two GHRH analogs tested for the same condition. One completed two Phase 3 trials and got approved. The other's Phase 2 was halted in 2006 and never restarted.

Read comparison ›
Skin and repair

Melanotan I vs Melanotan II

Not two versions of one compound. One is an FDA approved implant for a rare disease, the other is approved nowhere and warned against by four regulators.

Read comparison ›
Longevity

Epitalon vs MOTS-c

Two longevity peptides with no published human trial between them. Epitalon's famous human data belongs to a bovine extract, and MOTS-c is something your body already makes.

Read comparison ›
Cognitive and mood

Semax vs Selank

Same Russian lab, same seven amino acids, built for different problems: Semax for alertness, Selank for anxiety.

Read comparison ›
Skin and repair

GHK-Cu vs Matrixyl

Two topical skin peptides with very different evidence: one carries copper, one carries a fat tail, and the most sold version of Matrixyl is built on the same tripeptide as GHK-Cu.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

BPC-157 vs TB-500

Both are sold for tendon and muscle repair. BPC-157's human trials were enemas for ulcerative colitis, and TB-500's trials did not even use TB-500.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

CJC-1295 with DAC vs without DAC

One name, two drugs: one has a measured half-life and three published human trials, the other has never been tested in a person.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Ipamorelin vs CJC-1295

They act on different receptors and are usually sold in the same vial. Each has human trials; the combination everyone buys has none.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

MK-677 vs Ipamorelin

Same receptor, a pill against an injection. MK-677 has far more human data, and that is exactly why we know more about what is wrong with it.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

KLOW vs GLOW

These are not two products. One contains the other: KLOW is GLOW plus KPV, and neither blend has ever been tested as a blend.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Sermorelin vs Ipamorelin

Two growth hormone peptides sold side by side. One was an approved drug and can still be compounded on prescription. The other was voted down in October 2024.

Read comparison ›

16 published

Compare is one of four tools on the site. See all tools.