Two approved drugs, and only one goes through your pituitary. Tesamorelin tells your pituitary to release its own growth hormone, so the body's own feedback system still applies. HGH is the hormone itself, injected directly, with no such limit. Both are FDA approved for specific conditions. Distributing HGH for anti-aging or athletic use is a federal felony carrying five years, and tesamorelin carries no equivalent provision.

| Attribute | Tesamorelin | HGH |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A GHRH analog | Growth hormone itself |
| Acts on | The pituitary | The whole body, directly |
| Subject to feedback | Yes | No |
| FDA approved | Yes, 2010 | Yes, several indications |
| Approved for | HIV-associated lipodystrophy | Deficiency states, and others |
| Off-label distribution | Ordinary off-label rules | Federal felony, five years [5] |
The feedback loop in row three explains most of row six.
HGH on this page means somatropin, the full 191 amino acid growth hormone. HGH Fragment 176-191 is a different compound, a 16 amino acid piece of the same hormone sold for fat loss, and nothing on this page applies to it.

A stabilised analog of growth hormone-releasing factor, sold as Egrifta. It binds GHRH receptors in the pituitary and prompts the gland to release its own growth hormone in its normal pulses. In plain terms: a message to the organ that already makes the hormone.

Recombinant human growth hormone, sold generically as somatropin: the 191 amino acid protein itself, made in bacteria or yeast. It does not ask anything. It arrives in the bloodstream as the finished hormone. In plain terms: the thing tesamorelin is trying to get your body to produce.
Tesamorelin works through the pituitary, so growth hormone comes out in pulses and the body's somatostatin brake still applies. Injected HGH bypasses that entirely. The feedback loop explains most of the difference between them, including why 47 percent of tesamorelin patients exceeded an IGF-1 threshold rather than far more.
Your pituitary releases growth hormone in bursts, mostly at night, and it stops when told to. A hormone called somatostatin applies the brake, and rising IGF-1 tells the system to ease off. The arrangement regulates itself.
Tesamorelin works inside that arrangement. It binds GHRH receptors in the pituitary and the gland releases its own growth hormone, in its own pulses, still under the same brake. [1] If IGF-1 climbs, the system responds the way it always does.
Injected HGH is not in that circuit at all. It arrives already made, so there is no pulse pattern to preserve and no brake that applies to it. Whatever dose goes in is the dose that acts.
That difference explains most of what follows: why tesamorelin's effects in trials stayed inside physiological ranges, why its side effect profile is milder, and why the law treats the two so differently.
It also sets the ceiling. Tesamorelin can only produce as much growth hormone as your pituitary is willing to release. If the gland is damaged or absent, it does nothing at all, which is why it was never a treatment for growth hormone deficiency and HGH is.
Tesamorelin works inside the circuit. HGH goes around it.
Tesamorelin has two Phase 3 trials totalling 806 patients, with visceral fat down 15.2 percent against a 5 percent increase on placebo. HGH has decades of evidence in deficiency states and a separate body of work showing it does not deliver what anti-aging buyers expect.
It replaces growth hormone extracted from human cadaver pituitaries after that supply was linked to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
A small study in the New England Journal of Medicine reports lean mass gains in older men. That paper launched the anti-aging growth hormone industry, and the journal later published an editorial distancing itself from how it had been used. [4]
Congress amends the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Distributing growth hormone for any use other than an approved indication becomes a federal felony carrying up to five years. [5]
Falutz publishes in the New England Journal of Medicine. 412 patients with HIV and excess abdominal fat. Visceral adipose tissue fell 15.2 percent on tesamorelin and rose 5.0 percent on placebo. [2]
Liu and colleagues publish a systematic review in Annals of Internal Medicine. Growth hormone in healthy older adults did not improve strength, and the authors conclude it cannot be recommended as an anti-aging therapy. [4]
For reduction of excess visceral abdominal fat in HIV patients with lipodystrophy. A pooled analysis of both Phase 3 trials, 806 patients, confirms a treatment effect of about 15.4 percent at 26 weeks. [2]
Extension work confirms the effect holds at 52 weeks, around 18 percent, and that reduced visceral fat comes with improved triglycerides and liver enzymes. [2]
Stanley publishes in JAMA. 50 HIV patients with abdominal fat accumulation, and the trial measures liver fat alongside visceral fat. Visceral fat fell a median 25 square centimetres against a 14 centimetre increase on placebo, and hepatic fat fraction fell 4.2 percent against 0.5. [6]
Run at the NIH and Massachusetts General. 61 adults with HIV and fatty liver disease, 12 months. Hepatic fat fell 37 percent in relative terms against placebo, 35 percent of the treated group dropped below the 5 percent threshold that defines the condition against 4 percent on placebo, and fibrosis progression was prevented. Published in Lancet HIV. [6]
Tesamorelin remains approved for one indication and is prescribed off-label for others. HGH remains approved for several, and distributing it outside them is still a felony.
The striking thing in the tesamorelin trials is what did not change. Visceral fat fell 15.2 percent while subcutaneous fat did not move, and neither did BMI. [2] The compound found the fat around the organs and left the fat under the skin alone, which is unusual enough that it is the basis of the approval.
That selectivity is the clinical argument for working through the pituitary rather than around it. The hormone came out in its own pattern, at its own concentrations, and did what the body's own growth hormone does.
There is a detail in the label that almost nobody mentions. Anti-tesamorelin antibodies were detected in 85 percent of treated patients, and patients with and without them had similar reductions in visceral fat and similar IGF-1 responses. [3] An antibody rate that high would usually end a drug programme. Here it appears not to have mattered.

A 2019 trial at the NIH and Massachusetts General gave tesamorelin to 61 people with HIV and fatty liver for 12 months, with biopsies. Liver fat fell 37 percent relative to placebo, a third of the treated group dropped below the diagnostic threshold, and fibrosis progression was prevented.
Visceral fat and liver fat travel together, so a drug that moves one tends to move the other. Tesamorelin's liver evidence started as a secondary measure in the fat trials and has since become the more interesting half of its record.
The 2019 trial is the one to know. 61 adults with HIV and a hepatic fat fraction of 5 percent or more, randomised to tesamorelin 2 mg daily or placebo for a year, run at the NIH and Massachusetts General. [6]
Liver fat fell by 4.1 percentage points in absolute terms against placebo, a 37 percent relative reduction. 35 percent of the treated group finished below the 5 percent fat threshold that defines the condition, against 4 percent on placebo. [6]
What makes it unusual is that they took biopsies. At baseline 43 percent of participants had fibrosis and 33 percent had steatohepatitis, and after a year fibrosis progression was prevented in the treated group. Histology is the standard liver trials are judged by and most never collect it. [6]
Blood glucose and HbA1c did not change, which matters because raising growth hormone activity can worsen glucose control. [6]
One limit runs through all of it. Every participant had HIV. Fatty liver in people with HIV behaves more aggressively than in the general population, and no trial has tested tesamorelin for liver fat in anyone else. The findings are real and their population is specific.
Everything that differs.
| Attribute | Tesamorelin | HGH |
|---|---|---|
| Also called | Egrifta, TH9507 | Somatropin, rhGH |
| Type | GHRH analog | Recombinant hormone, 191 amino acids |
| Acts on | Pituitary GHRH receptors | Growth hormone receptors throughout the body |
| Release pattern | Pulsatile, the body's own | Whatever the injection delivers |
| Subject to somatostatin feedback | Yes | No |
| Works if the pituitary is damaged | No | Yes |
| Main approval | HIV lipodystrophy, 2010 [2] | Deficiency states and others, since 1985 |
| Pivotal evidence | Two Phase 3 trials, 806 patients [2] | Decades, across several indications |
| Effect on visceral fat | 15.2 percent reduction [2] | Reduces fat, not selectively |
| Effect on subcutaneous fat | None measured [2] | Not selective |
| Liver fat evidence | 37 percent relative reduction, with biopsies [6] | None comparable |
| Antibody formation | 85 percent, without loss of effect [3] | Occurs, varies by product |
| Off-label distribution | Ordinary rules | Federal felony [5] |
| Cost | High, specialty pharmacy | High, specialty pharmacy |
Tesamorelin needs a working pituitary and HGH does not. Tesamorelin cut visceral fat 15.2 percent while leaving subcutaneous fat and BMI unchanged, and HGH is not selective. Distributing HGH off-label carries five years and tesamorelin follows ordinary rules.
Summary compiled from FDA labelling and published trials.
A 1990 amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act made distributing growth hormone for any non-approved use a federal felony carrying up to five years. No equivalent provision exists for tesamorelin or any other GHRH analog.
Off-label prescribing is normal in American medicine. A doctor can prescribe most approved drugs for conditions they were not approved for, and that is legal and often appropriate.
Growth hormone is one of the few exceptions, and the exception is specific. A 1990 amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act makes it a felony to distribute or possess with intent to distribute growth hormone for any use other than an approved indication. The term is up to five years, rising to ten where a person under 18 is involved. [5]
Congress wrote that because of what happened after 1990. The Rudman paper had just appeared, the anti-aging market formed around it almost immediately, and the law was a response to that market rather than to the hormone's risks.
Tesamorelin has no equivalent provision. It is a GHRH analog, not growth hormone, and the statute names growth hormone. Prescribing tesamorelin off-label follows the same rules as prescribing anything else off-label.
If you are being offered either one for anti-aging or athletic use, that legal difference is worth understanding before anything else. For HGH, the person selling it is committing a felony. For tesamorelin, they are not, which says nothing about whether the prescription is a good idea.
Four gaps, starting with the comparison itself.
No trial has compared the two directly.Not in any population, for any outcome. Every comparison in circulation sets separate trials against each other.
Tesamorelin's long-term cardiovascular safety is unestablished.That is stated as a limitation on the FDA label itself, not inferred by us. [3]
Nobody has tested tesamorelin in people without HIV.The Phase 3 trials enrolled HIV patients with lipodystrophy, the liver trials enrolled HIV patients with fatty liver, and the growing off-label market is people with neither. [2][6] Fatty liver in people with HIV behaves differently from the general case, so the liver findings in particular do not transfer without testing.
Nobody knows what the 85 percent antibody rate means over years.The trials found no loss of effect inside 52 weeks. [3] Nothing establishes what happens in year three.
If your pituitary does not work, tesamorelin does nothing and HGH is the treatment. If you have HIV with excess visceral fat or fatty liver, tesamorelin has 806 patients and a 61-patient liver trial behind it. For anti-aging, neither has evidence and distributing one of them carries five years.
Most of this decides itself on the clinical picture rather than on preference.
If you have growth hormone deficiency, tesamorelin is not an option. It works by asking the pituitary and a damaged gland cannot answer. [1] HGH is the treatment, and that is what it is approved for.
If you have HIV with excess visceral fat, tesamorelin is the drug with the approval and the trials, and the fat loss was selective to the visceral depot. [2]
If you have HIV with fatty liver, tesamorelin has a year-long randomised trial with biopsies behind it and HGH does not. [6]
For anti-aging, athletic performance or general body composition in healthy adults, neither has been tested and growth hormone specifically has been tested and found wanting. Liu and colleagues reviewed it in healthy older adults and found no strength improvement. [4] For that use, the thing to understand first is that distributing HGH carries five years. [5]
Tesamorelin's common effects are injection site reactions, joint pain and swelling, with 47.4 percent of patients exceeding IGF-1 of two standard deviations at 26 weeks. HGH carries the heavier profile, and the gap is largely about the feedback loop.
From the approved label and the Phase 3 programme.
Decades of use across approved and unapproved settings.
This is where the two diverge most sharply.
*Where this page says nothing is established, it means nobody has studied it. It does not mean a compound is safe.
The IGF-1 figure deserves attention. Nearly half of treated patients went above two standard deviations at 26 weeks, which is the threshold at which the label advises considering dose reduction or discontinuation. [3] Working through the pituitary limits how high growth hormone goes. It does not mean nothing goes high. If you are prescribed either, IGF-1 monitoring is the measure that matters, and the tesamorelin trials checked it every three months. [3]
Both. Growth hormone and its releasing factors sit in section S2 of the Prohibited List, which names GHRH and its analogs explicitly alongside growth hormone itself.
Section S2 covers peptide hormones, growth factors and related substances, and it names both growth hormone and growth hormone releasing factors.
Tesamorelin is a GHRH analog, which is exactly what that section describes. HGH is growth hormone. Both are prohibited at all times, in and out of competition.
Growth hormone has been a named anti-doping target for decades, and the testing methods for it are among the more developed in the field.
Both, which separates this comparison from most on this site.
Tesamorelin is approved for one thing: reduction of excess visceral abdominal fat in HIV-infected patients with lipodystrophy. [2] The label also notes that long-term cardiovascular safety has not been established, which is unusual to find stated so plainly and worth reading as written.
HGH is approved for several conditions, including growth hormone deficiency in children and adults, Turner syndrome, chronic kidney disease in children, and short bowel syndrome, among others.
Both are real pharmaceutical products with real approvals. The question here is not whether they work. It is what they were approved to do, and what happens when they are used for something else.
That second part is where the law enters, and only for one of them.
No. Tesamorelin is a GHRH analog that prompts your pituitary to release its own growth hormone, and HGH is the hormone itself, injected directly. [1] Tesamorelin needs a working pituitary and HGH does not.
HGH, in the sense that there is no ceiling on it. Tesamorelin can only produce as much growth hormone as your pituitary will release, while an injected dose of HGH acts regardless of what your body would have done. [1] Whether more is better is a separate question, and the trials in healthy older adults suggest it is not. [4]
Because a 1990 amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act specifically names growth hormone, making distribution for non-approved uses a federal felony carrying up to five years. [5] No equivalent provision covers tesamorelin or other GHRH analogs, so it follows ordinary off-label rules.
Visceral fat, yes, by about 15 percent over 26 weeks in its Phase 3 trials, against a 5 percent increase on placebo. [2] Subcutaneous fat, the layer under the skin, did not change, and neither did BMI. The two trials enrolled HIV patients with lipodystrophy rather than the general population.
No, and that is the clearest limit on it. Tesamorelin works by asking the gland to release growth hormone, so if the gland is damaged or absent there is nothing to ask. [1] That is why HGH is the treatment for growth hormone deficiency and tesamorelin is not.
Injection site reactions, joint pain, swelling and muscle aches are the common ones. [3] Nearly half of treated patients exceeded IGF-1 of two standard deviations at 26 weeks, which is the point at which the label suggests considering a dose change, and long-term cardiovascular safety has not been established.
Yes, and it appears not to matter. Anti-tesamorelin antibodies were detected in 85 percent of treated patients, and those with and without them had similar reductions in visceral fat and similar IGF-1 responses. [3] What that means over several years is unknown.
In people with HIV, yes, with better evidence than most liver drugs have. A 12-month randomised trial with biopsies found liver fat fell 37 percent relative to placebo, 35 percent of the treated group dropped below the diagnostic threshold against 4 percent on placebo, and fibrosis progression was prevented. [6] Nobody has tested it for liver fat in people without HIV.
Not in the way people usually mean. It reduced visceral fat, the fat around the organs, by about 15 percent, and left subcutaneous fat and BMI unchanged. [2] The scale does not move. Nothing in the trials supports it as a weight loss drug and it was never studied as one.
Its side effect profile is milder and the mechanism explains why, though neither has long-term safety data of the kind that would settle it. Working through the pituitary keeps release pulsatile and under the body's own feedback. [1] Tesamorelin's own label states that long-term cardiovascular safety has not been established. [3]
It is a specialty pharmacy product and expensive, and current pricing varies enough by insurance and pharmacy that any figure here would mislead. Ask the prescribing clinic for a benefits check before starting.
Not on the evidence. Liu and colleagues reviewed growth hormone in healthy older adults and found it did not improve strength, concluding it cannot be recommended as an anti-aging therapy. [4] The 1990 Rudman paper that launched the market was small, and the journal that published it later distanced itself from how it had been used.
Growth hormone deficiency in children and adults, plus several growth-related conditions including Turner syndrome, chronic kidney disease in children and short bowel syndrome. Anti-aging, athletic performance and general body composition are not among them, and distributing it for those uses is a federal felony. [5]
Fluid retention, joint and muscle pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, insulin resistance and raised blood glucose are the common ones. With prolonged excess it can produce features of acromegaly, because an injected dose is not subject to the feedback that limits your own growth hormone. [1]
Not for anti-aging or athletic use. A 1990 amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act makes distributing growth hormone for any non-approved use a federal felony carrying up to five years, rising to ten where someone under 18 is involved. [5] Possessing it on a valid prescription for an approved condition is lawful.
No, and the names cause real confusion. HGH is somatropin, the full 191 amino acid hormone, approved for several conditions and a felony to distribute off-label. [5] HGH Fragment 176-191 is a 16 amino acid piece of the same hormone's tail, sold for fat loss, approved nowhere, and not covered by that statute. Nothing on this page applies to the fragment.
Both. Section S2 of the Prohibited List names growth hormone and its releasing factors explicitly, so tesamorelin and HGH are both prohibited at all times.
What Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov hold for each, on the same rule.
Tesamorelin has 132 records to HGH (Somatropin)'s 601. 48 original human studies against 246. Tesamorelin has 24 registered trials to HGH (Somatropin)'s 821.
Tesamorelin: WADA: Prohibited at all times, in and out of competition. S2.2.4 Growth hormone releasing factors: GHRH and its analogues (tesamorelin named). Non-Specified. · FDA via DailyMed: Indicated for the reduction of excess abdominal fat in HIV-infected adult patients with lipodystrophy. Limitations of use: long-term cardiovascular safety has not been established; not indicated for weight loss management
HGH (Somatropin): WADA: Prohibited at all times, in and out of competition. S2.2.3 Growth hormone (GH), its analogues and fragments. Non-Specified.
The published recordTesamorelin
Papers and trials about Tesamorelin
98 papers tagged human · 48 not reviews or lab · 24 clinical trial publications
24 registered trials · 10 with posted results
Compare this against the whole library →
Prohibited at all times, in and out of competition. S2.2.4 Growth hormone releasing factors: GHRH and its analogues (tesamorelin named). Non-Specified.RegulatorsCounted from Europe PMC indexing, not read by a person; a human tag can land on reviews, commentary or lab papers; clinical trial publications is the narrower count.
The published recordHGH (Somatropin)
Papers and trials about HGH (Somatropin)
421 papers tagged human · 246 not reviews or lab · 59 clinical trial publications
821 registered trials · 18 with posted results
Compare this against the whole library →
Prohibited at all times, in and out of competition. S2.2.3 Growth hormone (GH), its analogues and fragments. Non-Specified.RegulatorsCounted from Europe PMC indexing, not read by a person; a human tag can land on reviews, commentary or lab papers; clinical trial publications is the narrower count. 501 papers and 100 trials indexed in detail.