Peptide Decoding
Two peptide vials side by side on a dark surface
Step 02 / Compare

Compare peptides side by side

Type two or more compounds the way you'd type them into Google. Spelling doesn't have to be right.

2/4

Separate them with vs, a comma, or +. Up to 4 compounds.

Try

Apraglutide is a glp-2 receptor agonist (modified peptide). Glepaglutide is a glp-2 receptor agonist (peptide with a six-lysine tail).

/compare/apraglutide-vs-glepaglutide
ComparisonApraglutide
FE 203799 · FE203799
Glepaglutide (Zeydovio)
Zeydovio · ZP1848
How it works
How it works

Apraglutide copies GLP-2, the gut hormone that tells the intestine to grow its lining and absorb more, and is changed to last a week.

How it works

Glepaglutide copies GLP-2, a gut hormone that tells the intestine to absorb more, and is built to release slowly from under the skin.

What it is
GLP-2 with four changed amino acids that stretch it to a weekly shot, with no fatty chain or PEG. In phase 3 it cut intravenous support by 25.5% against 12.5% on placebo, but not significantly in people whose colon is still connected.
A GLP-2 with a six-lysine tail that is released slowly from a depot under the skin, so it can be given twice a week. Recommended for EU approval in September 2026; the FDA asked for another trial.
Status
In trialsInvestigational
In trialsInvestigational
Typical dose
2.5–5 mg per week
10 mg per dose
single fixed dose
How often
Once weekly
Twice weekly
Stays active
About 30 hours (healthy volunteers, single dose)
About 88 hours (effective, after injection under the skin)
Dose comes from
Clinical trial protocol
Clinical trial protocol
Cycled?
Continuous in the trials Clinical trial protocol
Continuous in the trials Clinical trial protocol
What it does
Drug class
GLP-2 receptor agonist (modified peptide)
GLP-2 receptor agonist (peptide with a six-lysine tail)
Used for
An experimental once-weekly injection for adults with short bowel syndrome who need intravenous nutrition or fluids. It is not approved anywhere.
An experimental twice-weekly injection for adults with short bowel syndrome who depend on intravenous nutrition or fluids. Recommended for EU approval in September 2026, but not approved anywhere yet.
Receptors hit
—
—
Numbers
Full dose line
2.5 or 5 mg once weekly, by body weight (phase 3 trial)
10 mg twice weekly (phase 3 trial)
Why that cycle
Given weekly for 24 weeks in STARS, for 48 weeks in people with the colon connected, and longer in the open-label STARS Extend, with no planned breaks.
Given twice weekly for 24 weeks in EASE SBS 1, then in extension trials of up to 104 weeks with no planned breaks; in interim company analyses of the extensions, reductions in intravenous support were generally maintained.
Weight / effect
Intravenous support volume down 25.5% against 12.5% on placebo at 24 weeks (STARS)
Intravenous support down 5.13 L a week against 2.85 L on placebo with twice-weekly dosing (EASE SBS 1)
Chain length
33 residues
39 residues
Common vial
—
—
Before you start
Route
Under the skin (subcutaneous)
Under the skin (subcutaneous)
Do not use if
Not studied in children: STARS enrolled adults 18 and over
Not studied in pregnancy or breastfeeding
Not studied in anyone with cancer, including colon cancer, within the past 5 years
Not studied in active inflammatory gut disease, major abdominal surgery in the past 6 months, decompensated heart failure, or severe kidney or liver impairment
Use outside a clinical trial: it is not approved anywhere
Not studied in children: the phase 3 enrolled adults aged 18 to 90
Not studied in bowel obstruction, radiation damage to the bowel, or moderately to severely active inflammatory bowel disease
Not studied in anyone with a history of colon cancer, or another cancer within the past 5 years
Not studied in pregnancy or breastfeeding, decompensated heart failure, or severe liver impairment
Use outside a clinical trial: it is not approved anywhere yet

What people actually report

Apraglutide

  • Described as generally well tolerated in phase 3, with 3.6% stopping for side effects against 1.9% on placebo; rates of individual side effects by group were not available in the sources checked.
  • Phase 2 effects included more urine, less thirst, swelling and stoma problems; teduglutide, the approved GLP-2 drug, carries warnings for bowel blockage and fluid overload.
Stop and get help if
  • Swelling of the legs, breathlessness or rapid weight gain, possible fluid overload
  • Severe abdominal pain, bloating or vomiting with little or no stool or stoma output, a possible bowel or stoma blockage

Glepaglutide (Zeydovio)

  • Injection-site reactions in 25.7% against 2.8% on placebo, nausea in 20.0% against 2.8% and abdominal pain in 14.3% against 5.6% on 10 mg twice weekly over 24 weeks.
  • Antibodies against the drug formed in 30 of 35 people on twice-weekly dosing and none on placebo, including antibodies that neutralized the main active form in 10 of 35, with unknown effect on benefit; teduglutide, the approved GLP-2 drug, carries warnings for bowel blockage and fluid overload.
Stop and get help if
  • Swelling of the legs, breathlessness or rapid weight gain: fluid retention or overload is among its most common side effects
  • Severe abdominal pain, bloating or vomiting with little or no stool or stoma output, a possible bowel or stoma blockage

Side effects are what users and trials report most often, not a complete list. Anything sudden, spreading, or breathing-related is an emergency regardless of which compound caused it.

People also compare

This comparison does not cover cost, long-term safety, or how you personally will respond. Effect figures come from separate trials in different populations and are not always directly comparable to each other. Nothing here is medical advice or a recommendation to use any of these. Talk to a clinician about your own situation.

Commonly confused peptides

Long-form breakdowns of the pairs people confuse most, traced to primary sources.

Metabolic and weight loss

Semaglutide vs Tirzepatide vs Retatrutide

One head-to-head trial, three pivotal trials, and why their headline weight-loss figures are not directly comparable.

Read comparison ›
Skin and repair

GHK vs GHK-Cu

The same sequence, with or without copper: topical trial evidence, formulation caveats and the research-vial market.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Semaglutide vs Liraglutide

In STEP 8, semaglutide produced more weight loss than liraglutide; liraglutide offers generic availability and daily dosing.

Read comparison ›
Muscle

Follistatin vs ACE-031

ACE-031 built muscle but was stopped for vascular side effects. Follistatin protein has not been tested by injection in people.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Liraglutide vs Semaglutide vs Tirzepatide vs Retatrutide

One receptor, then two, then three, and the numbers climb with them. Only two of the three steps have a head to head behind them.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

HGH vs Sermorelin

Distributing HGH for anti-aging is a federal felony carrying five years. Sermorelin lost to it commercially in 2008 and can still be legally compounded.

Read comparison ›
Muscle

IGF-1 LR3 vs IGF-1 DES

Neither has a single published human trial, and sources give LR3's half-life as anywhere from 6 to 30 hours. There is an FDA approved IGF-1, and it is neither of these.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

Thymosin Alpha-1 vs LL-37

One is approved in 35 countries and its largest trial found nothing. The other has never been injected in a published study.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Cagrilintide vs Semaglutide

Both were tested in the same trial, in the same people, over the same 68 weeks. Semaglutide won on weight, and the combination beat both while coming in below their sum.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Petrelintide vs Semaglutide

Semaglutide produced 16.9 percent in STEP 1 against petrelintide's 10.7 in ZUPREME-1. Petrelintide's case is tolerability: no vomiting at its best dose, and no added dropouts over placebo.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Semaglutide vs Tirzepatide

Tirzepatide won the head-to-head at 20.2 percent against 13.7. The 47 percent figure everyone quotes is relative; the absolute gap is 6.5 points, from an open-label trial.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Retatrutide vs Tirzepatide

Retatrutide's 28.3 percent is being set against tirzepatide's 22.5 percent. Different trials, different lengths, and no trial yet comparing the two directly.

Read comparison ›
Sexual and hormonal

PT-141 vs Kisspeptin

Both are sold for sex. One works on desire and is FDA approved, the other works on hormones and stops working within two weeks.

Read comparison ›
Longevity

MOTS-c vs SS-31

One has an FDA approval and a failed Phase 3. The other has never been given to a person in a published study.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Tesamorelin vs CJC-1295

Two GHRH analogs tested for the same condition. One completed two Phase 3 trials and got approved. The other's Phase 2 was halted in 2006 and never restarted.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Tesamorelin vs HGH

Both are FDA approved. Tesamorelin asks your pituitary for growth hormone and HGH is the hormone itself, and only one is a felony to distribute off-label.

Read comparison ›
Skin and repair

Melanotan I vs Melanotan II

Not two versions of one compound. One is an FDA approved implant for a rare disease, the other is approved nowhere and warned against by four regulators.

Read comparison ›
Longevity

Epitalon vs MOTS-c

Two longevity peptides with no published human trial between them. Epitalon's famous human data belongs to a bovine extract, and MOTS-c is something your body already makes.

Read comparison ›
Longevity

Glutathione vs NAD+

Both are sold as injections. NAD+ cannot enter cells intact, and a six month trial found oral glutathione raising body stores the injection is meant to fix.

Read comparison ›
Cognitive and mood

Noopept vs Semax

Two Russian medicines no Western regulator has assessed. Semax is a seven amino acid peptide; Noopept is not a peptide at all.

Read comparison ›
Cognitive and mood

Semax vs Selank

Same Russian lab, same seven amino acids, built for different problems: Semax for alertness, Selank for anxiety.

Read comparison ›
Skin and repair

GHK-Cu vs Matrixyl

Two topical skin peptides with very different evidence: one carries copper, one carries a fat tail, and Matrixyl 3000, a widely used formulation, is built on the same tripeptide as GHK-Cu.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

BPC-157 vs TB-500

Both are sold for tendon and muscle repair. BPC-157's human trials were enemas for ulcerative colitis, and TB-500's trials did not even use TB-500.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

BPC-157 vs KPV

BPC-157's Phase 2 results were never published. KPV has no human trial; neither was tested as an injection for the uses it is sold for.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

CJC-1295 with DAC vs without DAC

One name, two drugs: one has a measured half-life and three published human trials, the other has never been tested in a person.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Ipamorelin vs CJC-1295

They act on different receptors and are usually sold in the same vial. Each has human trials; the combination everyone buys has none.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

MK-677 vs Ipamorelin

Same receptor, a pill against an injection. MK-677 has far more human data, and that is exactly why we know more about what is wrong with it.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

KLOW vs GLOW

These are not two products. One contains the other: KLOW is GLOW plus KPV, and neither blend has ever been tested as a blend.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Sermorelin vs Ipamorelin

Two growth hormone peptides sold side by side. One was an approved drug and can still be compounded on prescription. The other was voted down in October 2024.

Read comparison ›
Sexual and hormonal

Enclomiphene vs HCG vs Gonadorelin vs Kisspeptin

Three sit on one hormone chain and the fourth skips it. The one with the best trial evidence was rejected by the FDA in 2015 and abandoned.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

Thymosin Alpha-1 vs Thymosin Beta-4 vs TB-500

Two are unrelated proteins sharing a name by accident. The third is seven amino acids taken from the second, and no trial has injected any of them.

Read comparison ›
Longevity

NAD+ vs NMN vs NR

Three points on one pathway: compare cellular uptake, human evidence and changing supplement rules.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Sermorelin vs Tesamorelin vs Ipamorelin vs CJC-1295

Three act on the GHRH receptor and one copies ghrelin. Only tesamorelin is approved, and the two with the weakest outcome data were both voted down by the FDA in late 2024.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

GLP-1 agonists compared

Twenty compounds act on the GLP-1 receptor. Eight are FDA approved. Most trial doses are not the same thing as a label dose. Here is what separates them.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

CT-388 vs Zovaglutide

Weekly dual-receptor CT-388 and monthly GLP-1 zovaglutide have not been compared head to head; their trial results use different measures and follow-up periods.

Read comparison ›
Muscle

ACE-031 vs GDF-8

Not two alternatives: ACE-031 is a drug built to neutralise GDF-8, the protein better known as myostatin. One has human trial data; the other is the brake itself.

Read comparison ›

36 published

Compare is one of the free tools on the site. See all tools.