Peptide Decoding
Two peptide vials side by side on a dark surface
Step 02 / Compare

Compare peptides side by side

Type two or more compounds the way you'd type them into Google. Spelling doesn't have to be right.

2/4

Separate them with vs, a comma, or +. Up to 4 compounds.

Try

LL-37 is a cathelicidin peptide. Splenopentin is a immune pentapeptide.

/compare/ll-37-vs-splenopentin
ComparisonLL-37
cathelicidin · hCAP-18
Splenopentin
SP-5 · splenopentin acetate
How it works
How it works

LL-37 is part of your innate immune system, the fast general-purpose defence that acts before your body has identified what it is fighting.

How it works

Splenopentin belongs to the same era and idea as thymopentin, and shares its problem.

What it is
A natural germ-fighting peptide for stubborn infections and wound healing.
A five-amino-acid spleen peptide, sold on an evidence base almost nobody has read.
Status
Research only
Research only
Typical dose
0.1–0.5 mg per dose
How often
Daily, short courses
Not established
Stays active
Nothing published
Nothing published
Dose comes from
Community practice
No established range
Cycled?
Taken in daily, short courses Community practice
Not established No established range
What it does
Drug class
Cathelicidin peptide
Immune pentapeptide
Used for
A natural germ-fighting peptide used against stubborn infections, biofilms, and gut bugs, and to support wound healing.
An immune peptide sold for immune support and bone marrow recovery.
Receptors hit
Numbers
Full dose line
0.1 up to 0.5 mg per dose (start low, increase slowly)
Research only
Why that cycle
Course dosing is how this one is normally used. Where the course length comes from is the thing to check: for most compounds in this pattern it is convention rather than a tested schedule.
No schedule has been studied for this compound in people.
Weight / effect
Not measured in a trial
Not measured in a trial
Chain length
37 residues
5 residues
Common vial
5 mg
Before you start
Route
Under the skin (subcutaneous)
Under the skin (subcutaneous)
Do not use if
No established systemic safety profile
Pregnancy
Autoimmune conditions, as a theoretical precaution
Pregnancy or breastfeeding
An autoimmune condition, without medical advice
Cancer treatment, where an unstudied peptide is not a substitute for supportive care that has been tested
Anyone who wants established safety data, because none exists for this compound in humans

What separates them

Proof behind the dose. Every dose here comes from community practice. Not one is backed by a published human study, which is worth knowing before you read the numbers as if they were equivalent.

What doesn't differ: They are both taken the same way (under the skin). Neither has a measured effect size from a published trial, so there is no number to rank them on.

Difference map
Each column keeps its compound color below. A shared gray row means the same answer; colored cells show where they split.
LL-37
Splenopentin
PROOF
Community practice
No established range

What people actually report

LL-37

  • It can irritate the injection site, with a theoretical autoimmune concern, and there is little human data.
Stop and get help if
  • Signs of an allergic reaction
  • A spreading rash or worsening inflammation

Splenopentin

  • The research behind it is old, small and largely unrepeated.
  • It affects immune cells, which is not desirable in every condition.
Stop and get help if
  • Signs of an allergic reaction, including spreading hives, facial or throat swelling, or trouble breathing
  • Redness, heat, or pus at the injection site, which can signal infection

Side effects are what users and trials report most often, not a complete list. Anything sudden, spreading, or breathing-related is an emergency regardless of which compound caused it.

People also compare

This comparison does not cover cost, long-term safety, or how you personally will respond. Effect figures come from separate trials in different populations and are not always directly comparable to each other. Nothing here is medical advice or a recommendation to use any of these. Talk to a clinician about your own situation.

Commonly confused peptides

Long-form breakdowns of the pairs people confuse most, traced to primary sources.

Healing and recovery

Thymosin Alpha-1 vs LL-37

One is approved in 35 countries and its largest trial found nothing. The other has never been injected in a published study.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Cagrilintide vs Semaglutide

Both were tested in the same trial, in the same people, over the same 68 weeks. Semaglutide won on weight, and the combination beat both while coming in below their sum.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Retatrutide vs Tirzepatide

Retatrutide's 28.3 percent is being set against tirzepatide's 22.5 percent. Different trials, different lengths, and one of the numbers comes from a press release.

Read comparison ›
Sexual and hormonal

PT-141 vs Kisspeptin

Both are sold for sex. One works on desire and is FDA approved, the other works on hormones and stops working within two weeks.

Read comparison ›
Longevity

MOTS-c vs SS-31

One has an FDA approval and a failed Phase 3. The other has never been given to a person in a published study.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Tesamorelin vs CJC-1295

Two GHRH analogs tested for the same condition. One completed two Phase 3 trials and got approved. The other's Phase 2 was halted in 2006 and never restarted.

Read comparison ›
Skin and repair

Melanotan I vs Melanotan II

Not two versions of one compound. One is an FDA approved implant for a rare disease, the other is approved nowhere and warned against by four regulators.

Read comparison ›
Longevity

Epitalon vs MOTS-c

Two longevity peptides with no published human trial between them. Epitalon's famous human data belongs to a bovine extract, and MOTS-c is something your body already makes.

Read comparison ›
Cognitive and mood

Semax vs Selank

Same Russian lab, same seven amino acids, built for different problems: Semax for alertness, Selank for anxiety.

Read comparison ›
Skin and repair

GHK-Cu vs Matrixyl

Two topical skin peptides with very different evidence: one carries copper, one carries a fat tail, and the most sold version of Matrixyl is built on the same tripeptide as GHK-Cu.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

BPC-157 vs TB-500

Both are sold for tendon and muscle repair. BPC-157's human trials were enemas for ulcerative colitis, and TB-500's trials did not even use TB-500.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

CJC-1295 with DAC vs without DAC

One name, two drugs: one has a measured half-life and three published human trials, the other has never been tested in a person.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Ipamorelin vs CJC-1295

They act on different receptors and are usually sold in the same vial. Each has human trials; the combination everyone buys has none.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

MK-677 vs Ipamorelin

Same receptor, a pill against an injection. MK-677 has far more human data, and that is exactly why we know more about what is wrong with it.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

KLOW vs GLOW

These are not two products. One contains the other: KLOW is GLOW plus KPV, and neither blend has ever been tested as a blend.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Sermorelin vs Ipamorelin

Two growth hormone peptides sold side by side. One was an approved drug and can still be compounded on prescription. The other was voted down in October 2024.

Read comparison ›

16 published

Compare is one of four tools on the site. See all tools.