Peptide Decoding
Two peptide vials side by side on a dark surface
Step 02 / Compare

Compare peptides side by side

Type two or more compounds the way you'd type them into Google. Spelling doesn't have to be right.

2/4

Separate them with vs, a comma, or +. Up to 4 compounds.

Try

Bronchogen and Cardiogen are each a short bioregulator peptide.

/compare/bronchogen-vs-cardiogen
ComparisonBronchogen
AEDL · Ala-Glu-Asp-Leu
Cardiogen
Cardiogen · AEDR
How it works
How it works

Bronchogen is four amino acids, marketed for lung and airway tissue.

How it works

Cardiogen is 4 amino acids long, written AEDR.

What it is
A bioregulator for lung and airway health, with thin evidence.
A lab-made 4 amino acid peptide aimed at the heart muscle.
Status
Research only
Research only
Typical dose
How often
Courses
Daily, in 10-20 day courses
Stays active
Nothing published
Nothing published
Dose comes from
No established range
No established range
Cycled?
Courses of 10 to 20 days, repeated two or three times a year Community practice
Daily for 10 to 20 days, then a long break Community practice
What it does
Drug class
Bioregulator peptide
Bioregulator (AEDR)
Used for
A bioregulator aimed at lung and airway health, taken in short courses.
Marketed for heart muscle and blood vessels as they age. Taken in short courses.
Receptors hit
Numbers
Full dose line
Varies (course-based)
Research only
Why that cycle
The course structure is how the Khavinson protocols specify these and how they are sold. No trial has compared course dosing against continuous use, or established how long the gap between courses should be.
The whole family is used in short courses repeated a few times a year. That pattern comes from Russian practice, not from a trial comparing it against anything else.
Weight / effect
Not measured in a trial
Not measured in a trial
Chain length
4 residues
4 residues
Common vial
10 mg
10 mg
Before you start
Route
Under the skin, or by mouth
Under the skin, or by mouth
Do not use if
Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Any prescription medicine you take regularly, without checking for interactions first
Anyone who wants established safety data, because none exists for this compound in humans
Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Active cancer, as a precaution given the claimed effect on gene activity
Known allergy to it

What separates them

Proof behind the dose. Every dose here comes from community practice. Not one is backed by a published human study, which is worth knowing before you read the numbers as if they were equivalent.

What doesn't differ: They are both taken the same way (under the skin, or by mouth). Neither has a measured effect size from a published trial, so there is no number to rank them on.

Difference map
Each column keeps its compound color below. A shared gray row means the same answer; colored cells show where they split.
Bronchogen
Cardiogen
PROOF
No established range
No established range

What people actually report

Bronchogen

  • Little human evidence.
Stop and get help if
  • Spreading hives, swelling of the face or throat, or trouble breathing, which can happen with any injection and is a medical emergency
  • Redness, heat, or pus at the injection site, which can signal infection

Cardiogen

  • Little human evidence.
Stop and get help if
  • Signs of an allergic reaction such as face or throat swelling, hives, or trouble breathing
  • Redness, heat, or pus where it was injected

Side effects are what users and trials report most often, not a complete list. Anything sudden, spreading, or breathing-related is an emergency regardless of which compound caused it.

People also compare

This comparison does not cover cost, long-term safety, or how you personally will respond. Effect figures come from separate trials in different populations and are not always directly comparable to each other. Nothing here is medical advice or a recommendation to use any of these. Talk to a clinician about your own situation.

The published record

What Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov hold for each, on the same rule.

Bronchogen has 34 records to Cardiogen's 1. 7 original human studies against 0. Bronchogen has 1 registered trials to Cardiogen's 1.

The published record

Research index

34

Records indexed for Bronchogen

9 in humans, 7 of them original studies.

1 registered trials, 0 with posted results.

Browse the records

In animalsPro
In the labPro
ReviewsPro
Senior author sharePro

Counted from Europe PMC indexing, not read by a person. Human means indexed under humans, which includes reviews and work on human cells. Original studies exclude reviews and lab work on human cells.Last updated 12 September 2026.

The published record

Research index

1

Records indexed for Cardiogen

1 in humans, 0 of them original studies.

1 registered trials, 0 with posted results.

Browse the records

In animalsPro
In the labPro
ReviewsPro
Senior author sharePro

Counted from Europe PMC indexing, not read by a person. Human means indexed under humans, which includes reviews and work on human cells. Original studies exclude reviews and lab work on human cells.Last updated 11 September 2026.

Commonly confused peptides

Long-form breakdowns of the pairs people confuse most, traced to primary sources.

Growth hormone

HGH vs Sermorelin

Distributing HGH for anti-aging is a federal felony carrying five years. Sermorelin lost to it commercially in 2008 and can still be legally compounded.

Read comparison ›
Muscle

IGF-1 LR3 vs IGF-1 DES

Neither has a single published human trial, and sources give LR3's half-life as anywhere from 6 to 30 hours. There is an FDA approved IGF-1, and it is neither of these.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

Thymosin Alpha-1 vs LL-37

One is approved in 35 countries and its largest trial found nothing. The other has never been injected in a published study.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Cagrilintide vs Semaglutide

Both were tested in the same trial, in the same people, over the same 68 weeks. Semaglutide won on weight, and the combination beat both while coming in below their sum.

Read comparison ›
Metabolic and weight loss

Retatrutide vs Tirzepatide

Retatrutide's 28.3 percent is being set against tirzepatide's 22.5 percent. Different trials, different lengths, and one of the numbers comes from a press release.

Read comparison ›
Sexual and hormonal

PT-141 vs Kisspeptin

Both are sold for sex. One works on desire and is FDA approved, the other works on hormones and stops working within two weeks.

Read comparison ›
Longevity

MOTS-c vs SS-31

One has an FDA approval and a failed Phase 3. The other has never been given to a person in a published study.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Tesamorelin vs CJC-1295

Two GHRH analogs tested for the same condition. One completed two Phase 3 trials and got approved. The other's Phase 2 was halted in 2006 and never restarted.

Read comparison ›
Skin and repair

Melanotan I vs Melanotan II

Not two versions of one compound. One is an FDA approved implant for a rare disease, the other is approved nowhere and warned against by four regulators.

Read comparison ›
Longevity

Epitalon vs MOTS-c

Two longevity peptides with no published human trial between them. Epitalon's famous human data belongs to a bovine extract, and MOTS-c is something your body already makes.

Read comparison ›
Longevity

Glutathione vs NAD+

Both are sold as injections. NAD+ cannot enter cells intact, and a six month trial found oral glutathione raising body stores the injection is meant to fix.

Read comparison ›
Cognitive and mood

Semax vs Selank

Same Russian lab, same seven amino acids, built for different problems: Semax for alertness, Selank for anxiety.

Read comparison ›
Skin and repair

GHK-Cu vs Matrixyl

Two topical skin peptides with very different evidence: one carries copper, one carries a fat tail, and the most sold version of Matrixyl is built on the same tripeptide as GHK-Cu.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

BPC-157 vs TB-500

Both are sold for tendon and muscle repair. BPC-157's human trials were enemas for ulcerative colitis, and TB-500's trials did not even use TB-500.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

CJC-1295 with DAC vs without DAC

One name, two drugs: one has a measured half-life and three published human trials, the other has never been tested in a person.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Ipamorelin vs CJC-1295

They act on different receptors and are usually sold in the same vial. Each has human trials; the combination everyone buys has none.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

MK-677 vs Ipamorelin

Same receptor, a pill against an injection. MK-677 has far more human data, and that is exactly why we know more about what is wrong with it.

Read comparison ›
Healing and recovery

KLOW vs GLOW

These are not two products. One contains the other: KLOW is GLOW plus KPV, and neither blend has ever been tested as a blend.

Read comparison ›
Growth hormone

Sermorelin vs Ipamorelin

Two growth hormone peptides sold side by side. One was an approved drug and can still be compounded on prescription. The other was voted down in October 2024.

Read comparison ›

19 published

Compare is one of four tools on the site. See all tools.