Peptide Decoding

Compare any peptides, side by side

Type two or more compounds the way you'd type them into Google. Spelling doesn't have to be right.

Separate them with vs, a comma, or +.

Try

GHK-Cu is a copper peptide. Melanotan I is a melanocortin receptor agonist.

ComparisonGHK-Cu
copper peptide · copper tripeptide-1
Melanotan I (Afamelanotide)
afamelanotide · Scenesse
How it works
How it works

GHK-Cu is three amino acids bound to a copper atom. Your body makes it, levels fall sharply with age, and the copper is doing much of the work.

How it works

Melanotan I copies alpha-MSH, the hormone that tells skin to make pigment. It is the only compound in this pair that is an approved medicine.

What it is
A copper skincare peptide for smoother, firmer, younger-looking skin.
The safer, approved tanning peptide for a slow, protective tan.
Status
Sold over the counterCosmetic ingredient
FDA approvedFDA-approved (Scenesse)
Typical dose
0.5–1 mg per day
How often
Daily
Daily then weekly
Dose comes from
No established range
Community practice
Cycled?
Not cycled Community practice
The approved implant is one every 2 months, about 3 a year FDA drug label
What it does
Drug class
Copper peptide
Melanocortin agonist
Used for
A skincare peptide used to smooth fine lines, fade dark spots, firm skin, and speed wound healing by boosting collagen. It is basically anti-aging for your skin.
The safer, approved tanning peptide. It builds a slow, even, protective tan and shifts skin toward real sun defense. It has fewer side effects than its cousin, but is slower and pricier.
Receptors hit
Numbers
Full dose line
Topical serum, 1-2 pumps
0.5 up to 1 mg per day (loading phase)
Why that cycle
Used daily as part of a routine. The effect depends on continued use and returns to baseline when you stop, so there is nothing to cycle off.
The approved product is an implant placed every two months, typically three times a year to cover spring and summer. That interval is on the label. The injectable version sold separately is a different product used on a loading-then-maintenance pattern that comes from community practice.
Weight / effect
Not measured in a trial
Not measured in a trial
Chain length
3 residues
13 residues
Common vial
50 mg
10 mg
Before you start
Route
On the skin (also injectable, off-label)
Under the skin (or implant)
Do not use if
A known copper allergy or metal sensitivity, so patch test first
Broken or actively irritated skin
Layering with strong acids or retinoids on the same area
Pregnancy
Approved only for a specific rare light-sensitivity disorder

What separates them

Proof behind the dose. Every dose here comes from community practice. Not one is backed by a published human study, which is worth knowing before you read the numbers as if they were equivalent.

Staying on it. GHK-Cu is taken continuously. Melanotan I is normally run in blocks with breaks, though for this one the block length is convention rather than a tested schedule.

What doesn't differ: Neither has a measured effect size from a published trial, so there is no number to rank them on.

Difference map
Each column keeps its compound color below. A shared gray row means the same answer; colored cells show where they split.
GHK-Cu
Melanotan I (Afamelanotide)
PROOF
No established range
Community practice
CYCLING
Continuous
Cycled

What people actually report

GHK-Cu

  • Very well tolerated on the skin.
  • Injecting it has little safety data.
Stop and get help if
  • A spreading rash or significant swelling where applied

Melanotan I (Afamelanotide)

  • A cleaner profile than Melanotan II, but you should still watch moles for changes.
Stop and get help if
  • A mole that changes in size, shape, or colour
  • Signs of an allergic reaction

Side effects are what users and trials report most often, not a complete list. Anything sudden, spreading, or breathing-related is an emergency regardless of which compound caused it.

People also compare

This comparison does not cover cost, long-term safety, or how you personally will respond. Effect figures come from separate trials in different populations and are not always directly comparable to each other. Nothing here is medical advice or a recommendation to use any of these. Talk to a clinician about your own situation.